Search for: "Browne & Appel, LLC" Results 261 - 280 of 425
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2012, 5:51 am by Bob Hoffer
  The superiority of the FAA was reaffirmed by the Court in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:24 am by WSLL
Representing Appellant (Defendant): M. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:42 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
:Craig Thorner and Virtual Reality Feedback Corporation (Appellants, collectively) accused Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC and a number of other Sony entities (Sony, collectively) of infringing claims of U.S. patent no. 6,422,941 (’941 patent) relating to a tactile feedback system for computer video games. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:57 am by Marcia Oddi
Thanks to the ISBA for posting this 9-page article by Maggie Smith of Frost Brown Todd LLC titled "Recent Amendments... [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:51 pm by WSLL
Copenhaver of Copenhaver, Kath, Kitchen & Kolpitcke, LLC, Powell, Wyoming; Bradley D. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
” With respect to the language dividing the “future retirement disbursements,” the mediator instructed that specific language be included in the divorce decree: W-6: 50.00% of HUSBAND’s future retirement disbursements from ISI Specialist, Inc. and/or Brand Industrial Specialist, LLC arising out of HUSBAND’s employment with ISI Specialist, Inc. and/or Brand Industrial Specialist, LLC as will be more particularly defined in a Qualified Domestic Relations… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
” With respect to the language dividing the “future retirement disbursements,” the mediator instructed that specific language be included in the divorce decree: W-6: 50.00% of HUSBAND’s future retirement disbursements from ISI Specialist, Inc. and/or Brand Industrial Specialist, LLC arising out of HUSBAND’s employment with ISI Specialist, Inc. and/or Brand Industrial Specialist, LLC as will be more particularly defined in a Qualified Domestic… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:26 pm by admin
Super Plaza Stores, LLC (05-10-00709-CV) – Recites well-established (1) standard for reviewing traditional summary judgment; (2) elements of common-law fraud cause of action; and (3) rule that intent and credibility of witnesses are issues for the trier of fact. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm by AALRR
  We think this is a significant setback for California employers because, to date, the only reported decision by a California appellate court regarding the enforceability of a PAGA waiver is the Brown v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:58 am by rquintilone
In Brown, the California appellate court refused to extend AT&T to a PAGA action in light of the fundamental nature and purpose of a PAGA claim. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm by AALRR
DauscherAs we previously reported here, on July 12, 2011, the California Court of Appeal held in Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am by SHG
 © 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]