Search for: "CAREY v. CAREY" Results 261 - 280 of 667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Hearing officer considers failed efforts at “progressive discipline” in setting disciplinary penaltyOATH Index No. 1721/16The New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA) served disciplinary charges against Carey Bryant, a clerical associate, alleging Bryant was guilty of being late to work excessively, several instances of discourtesy, threatening and disruptive conduct, and making a false statement in a supervisory conference. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
By looking at the term’s cases—most notably Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:01 am
It approaches this age-old problem through the lens of SongByrd, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Teaching academic, author of acclaimed defamation law textbooks, leading media law barrister in Australia and the UK, Dr Matt Collins QC packs a lot into his day … He agreed to spare some of his time to discuss defamation, privacy, celebrity, journalists’ sources, and free speech, just for starters GLJ: I wanted to start by asking you what you see as the major flaws in Australian defamation law, and how you might go about correcting them. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
 The touchstone became economic evidence (see Lucent v Gateway, ResQnet v Lansa, Uniloc v Microsoft). [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:33 am by Brian Cordery
Carey summarised the Apple v Samsung saga and concluded that whether patentees could get a permanent injunction in the US was up in the air at the moment. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:04 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Joshua T Carback (University of Maryland, Francis King Carey School of Law, Students) has posted Ocasio v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]