Search for: "CJ v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm by INFORRM
A v B plc (the Flitcroft case) [2003] QB 195 – Lord Woolf CJ gave the judgment of the court in this now notorious and discredited privacy case – Laws and Dyson LJJ were the other members of the Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The 7th amendment, believe it or not, does not apply in state courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2006, 2:38 am
The High Court in England seems to have made it far easier for a child-abducting parent to prove the defenses of consent and acquiescence in a Hague Convention child abduction case than has previously been the case.In CJ v KJ [2005] EWHC 2998 (Fam), Mr. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:17 pm
(AP Photo/Nick Ut) As readers of the LB know, one of the top cases of the current Supreme Court term is Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
There has been much noise lately that President Trump ought not get a nominee on the Supreme Court while an investigation is in progress, or, if he does, that the nominee should recuse himself in any case of constitutional confrontation with the President on the order of United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 CA and DC: Lord Judge CJ, David Clarke, Lloyd Jones JJ: 29 June 2010 – read judgment A new High Court decision has struck a blow for legal certainty and enforced the sometimes forgotten right under human rights law against retrospective criminal sanctions, which applies even in cases where the UK had failed to enact European… [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:11 pm
   Legal Reasoning (Rader, CJ, Moore, Wallach):[1] Construing "inert to light" Representative Claim 11. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
State of Indiana , a 13-page opinion, CJ Baker wrties:Appellant-defendant Tony A. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield… [read post]