Search for: "California Accounts, Inc. v. Superior Court" Results 261 - 280 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by Mandelman
  Well, if I remember correctly, there was a whole gaggle of talking heads acting kind of superior and questioning why the group was protesting and what their goals were? [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am by Terry Moritz
  The Ninth Circuit, relying on a decision by the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
Spallas (collectively, plaintiffs) asserted claims against Fotouhi for violating the partnership agreement and filed a petition in the superior court to compel arbitration. [read post]