Search for: "California Co. v. Price" Results 261 - 280 of 895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2009, 7:25 am by Bradley Wrightsel
The Ohio Supreme Court in its decision, Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Kutler’s entry on New York Times Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm by Bona Law PC
The practical effect of the decision was substantially because many US States, particularly California and New York, still apply, at least arguably, a per se standard to resale price maintenance agreements. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 9:39 am by Charles Bieneman
” Nonetheless, the Second Circuit here decided to follow Massillon-Cleveland-Akron Sign Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm by Schachtman
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 295 F.2d 292 (1961); Lartigue v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
 Nonetheless, the Court found that the plaintiff’s counsel was co-counsel in a similar case in California in which a nationwide class has been certified for necessarily the same conspiracy pursuant to California law. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
For this man, a $50 piece of equipment came with a multimillion-dollar price tag.Crocker C. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  However, Conte was decided by but one of several California appellate courts, and we understand that they don’t have to follow each other’s decisions. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:14 pm
PTS further accuses Defendants of offering the LipidPlus testing strip at a price that is both extremely low and below cost. [read post]