Search for: "California v. Super. Ct."
Results 261 - 280
of 499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2021, 3:48 pm
Ct. at 66–67). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
Super. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 2:59 pm
Super. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Ct. 873 (2012), upheld the challenged aspect of copyright law against First Amendment challenge based in part on the fact that the law “leaves undisturbed … the ‘fair use’ defense. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Super. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:31 am
Ct. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:12 pm
California Baptist University, RIC1302245 (Riverside Super Ct. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
[This is a five-part series exploring the thirty-year-plus journey through California's property tax history, which led up to January's abolition of California's redevelopment agencies, using as our source text the preamble from the RDA abolition decision in California Redevelopment Association et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:38 pm
Ct. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Ct. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:00 pm
And we're super harsh on that. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
Ct. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:50 am
Super. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 10:50 am
Patent No. 5,859,601 is super interesting because it is so similar to the patent rejected by the Supreme Court in Gottschalk v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
Ct. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:07 am
Super Ct., Los Angeles Cty), alleges claims under California Civil Code § 3344 (requiring parental consent for the use of a minor’s persona in advertising), the California Constitution, Art. 1, section 1 (right of privacy), and California Business and Professions Code §§ 17203 and 17204 (unfair competition law). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
Super Shuttle of Los Angeles (1993) 20 CA 4th 256, 261 (pdf). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
Super Shuttle of Los Angeles (1993) 20 CA 4th 256, 261 (pdf). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Superior Court of California, 137 S. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
Super. [read post]
