Search for: "Challenger One Holdings, LLC" Results 261 - 280 of 3,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 8:21 am by Dennis Crouch
During the IPR the patentee (Parus Holdings) made a number of arguments  supporting the validity of the challenged claims. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:13 pm by Mary E. Hodges
Sometimes this entity holding the note upon default is a non-FINRA member company, such as a subsidiary of the broker-dealer or holding company set up specifically to hold promissory notes. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:15 am by Patricia Salkin
At the Board hearing, Pawn 1st, LLC, a competing pawn shop, opposed the variance. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 3:59 am by Tammy Binford
Smith, executive director for WorkPlace HR, LLC, has suggestions for employers trying to move from discord to civility. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, Temi Orekunrin and Megan O’Neill of CMS summarise the second day of submissions in the appeal of Lloyd v Google LLC. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by Francis Pileggi
The Chancellor of the Delaware Court of Chancery recently presented a challenge to controller Jeffries Financial Group Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:14 am by Bob Eisenbach
But holding equity — stock in a corporation or a membership interest in an LLC, a limited liability company — can be even worse. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
"Judge Callahan holds, however, that there's precisely such “clearly irreconcilable” intervening authority: Sorrell v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Neapco Holdings LLC, No. 20-891 (eligibility); and PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:12 am by Peter Mahler
__ Yes __ No Can a cashed-out LLC minority member subsequently challenge the merger on grounds of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or other unlawfulness? [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:32 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under LLC Law 702, one must be an actual member of the LLC to have standing to sue for dissolution. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:33 am by SHG
”  To divorce the rhetoric from the holding is to live in a fantasy. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 am by Dennis Crouch
Click-to-Call Tech (Supreme Court 2020) In this case, the Supreme Court has sided with the PTO and Patent-Challengersholding that the agency’s decision to hear an IPR challenge is not reviewable on appeal — even if the challenge is based upon the time-bar of §315(b). [read post]