Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
In Chambers v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:37 pm
Lack of legal recognition for same-sex relationships again In Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine [2023] ECHR 442, the Fifth Section found that, in light of the Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova and Others, the absence of any legal recognition and protection for same-sex couples was a violation of Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 8. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:35 am
For example, Gravel v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
Blume v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
Schutte v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
Chapter 28 of Outside In describes Back v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Monday's decision in Hicks v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:14 pm
R. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:10 am
In Maymulakhin & Markiv v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:18 pm
Concurring in Caetano v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:27 am
Haas v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
For the first time in the ICC’s history, in September 2019 a Pre-Trial Chamber recognized charges of gender persecution in Prosecutor v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:01 pm
(Full disclosure: One of the authors of this post advised the Illinois Chamber of Commerce in its negotiations with the State legislature over this law and, hence, can speak from personal experience on the legislative history of this “punt. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
Doughty Street Chambers also covered the case in their blog. [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am
Unsurprisingly in view of the Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova and Others v Russia [2023] ECHR 55, the Court held (though only by five votes to two) that there has been a violation of Article 8. [read post]
