Search for: "Cherry v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 10:07 am
  Mr Justice Carr at [224] and [225] stated:"Insofar as this submission suggests that hindsight “cherry-picking” from the prior art is impermissible, then I agree. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
In these cases, too, the state belatedly disclosed the prosecution’s notes in the capital trials. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:20 am
Update by the State Board of Parole Commissioners Concerning the Status of Parole Hearings as Impacted by Assembly Bill No. 510 (2007) and Senate Bill No. 471 (2007) V. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:57 pm
  The piece is titled "Of Atkins and Men: Deviations from Clinical Definitions of Mental Retardation in Death Penalty Cases", and here is the abstract: Under Atkins v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Equitable estoppel cannot apply where plaintiff cherry-picks which information to rely on and which facts to ignore. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:01 am by Frank Marciano
The rules changed after the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its ruling in the 2017 case of Bisbing v. [read post]