Search for: "Clark v. Brown" Results 261 - 280 of 482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Tuesday 13 March 2012 is the one day hearing of NJDB v JEG and anor, on appeal from the Court of Session (Scotland) and to be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Clarke, Wilson and Reed. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
Brown, holding that states may not carve specific classes of claims out of the Federal Arbitration Act; PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
These appeals are being heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Judge, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor continues this week in the Supreme Court from Monday until Wednesday, and is being heard by a panel of seven (L Hope, L Walker, L Dyson, L Brown, L Clarke, L Sumption and L Reed). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
Tuesday 21 February will see the beginning of a six day hearing for Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of the Inland Revenue& anr in front of a seven judge panel ( L Hope, L Walker, L Brown, L Clarke, L Dyson, L Sumption, L Reed). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Karen Tani
” The "doll studies" factored importantly into the Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
Starting on Monday 13 February 2012 is the two day appeal of R (on the application of ST (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in front of a panel of seven (L Hale, L Hope, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr, L Clarke and L Dyson). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
They first will contend that the Texas Supreme Court should follow its 1909 holding in Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
In the Privy Council starting on Wednesday 1 February 2012 is the hearing of Sans Souci Ltd v VRL Services Ltd, which will be heard by Lady Paton and Lords Hope, Clarke, Sumption, and Reed. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am by Laura Sandwell
It is for Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr to determine whether there is an automatic right to appeal. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by Kali Borkoski
Brown Clarksburg Nursing Home & Rehabilitation Center, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers
These appeals from the Court of Appeal (Civ) will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance and Kerr. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
In R v Brown (Anthony) [1994] 1 AC 212 sadomasochists were held to have been rightly convicted of causing injury to others who willingly consented to the injuries that they received. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:48 am by Laura Sandwell
Hilary Term begins in the Privy Council on Thursday 12 January 2012 with the one day hearing in front of Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr and Wilson of Rukhmin Balgobin v South West Regional Health Authority, which is on appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:52 am by Kiran Bhat
At the National Law Journal (via Law.com), Clark Neily and Paul Sherman urge the Court to grant cert. in Locke v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:23 am
Clarke (D-NY) on 11/01/11 Amends the INA with respect to V visa (spouses/children of LPR who come to the United States to wait for completion of immigrant visa process) nonimmigrants to include certain Haitian nationals whose petition for a family-sponsored immigrant visa was approved on or before January 12, 2010. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future… [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
Kluger, Simple Justice:  The History of Brown v. [read post]