Search for: "Clear v. United States of America" Results 261 - 280 of 2,643
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2022, 9:37 am by Ronald Mann
United States last week, this looks like a good example of a case where a lower court failed to understand how clear a statute needs to be to create a jurisdictional bar that the Supreme Court will respect. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Wade, decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:57 pm by Michael Oykhman
 In a case called United States of America v Dynar, 1997 CanLII 359 (SCC), [1997] 2 SCR 462 (a Canadian case) it was noted that “a person may be convicted of attempt, even when completion of the criminal act was impossible at the time”. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Back in 2012, it was crystal clear (to me anyway) that Justice Kagan should recuse herself from the important Obama Care case NFIB v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:58 am by jonathanturley
In the United States, it is extremely difficult to maintain a “group libel” case even when there is jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 5:56 am by Jonathan Hafetz
In considering this trade-off, it is important to remember that the United States bears full responsibility for the unconscionable delay and continuing legal morass. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:42 pm
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 619 et. seq. (1919). [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
’”[1] It offers some enhanced protections to visual artists working in the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]