Search for: "Clinton v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2010, 11:36 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 11:45 am
Appellees cite State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
Clinton. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
City of Miami and Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:47 am
Gross: “I would ask that counsel also brief whether our cases that have abandoned the historical understanding of the Eighth Amendment, beginning with Trop [v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:12 am
The State Department miserably handled many of the FOIA requests concerning Secretary Clinton. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:50 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:21 pm
See, e.g., Clinton v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 6:01 pm
United States (the anti-commandeering principle)Clinton v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:23 pm
United States and Miller v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
Third Circuit decision addresses free speech and termination for just cause issuesRita Miller v Clinton County [Pennsylvania], USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket # 07-2105In this case, the Circuit Court of Appeals sets out the guidelines followed by courts in resolving claims by public officers and employees that their employer has violated their First Amendment right to free speech and the impact of the terms of a collective bargaining agreement on judicial control over the hiring,… [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:16 pm
Senator Clinton, what do you say? [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
He argues that Clinton v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:01 am
The court's decision casts serious doubt on many of the measures currently in place, most notably in relation to the United States's own national security and surveillance activities, and thus raises new questions about how the European Union would continue to interact with the global digital economy. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
[The walls are closing on universal, non-party injunctions against state laws. ] Labrador v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
