Search for: "Couch v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2008, 10:37 pm
Co. a/s/o Raymon Morgan v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:24 am
" Couch v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
Challenging an employee's termination during his or her disciplinary probation periodWoods v State Univ. of N.Y., 2017 NY Slip Op 03083, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn 2013 a member of a collective bargaining unit [Employee] represented by the New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
While couched in terms of the arbitrator exceeding his authority, the Appellate Division held that "in reality [the District] is contending that 'the arbitrator did not have the power to decide the question at issue and, therefore, there was nothing to arbitrate.'" However, said the court, by submitting to arbitration, the District ran the risk that the arbitrator would find the dispute covered under the CBA, as he did, notwithstanding District's position that the… [read post]
Estrada v. Salas-Perez, 2012 WL 4503147 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico][Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
20 Nov 2012, 8:20 am
In Estrada v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:39 am
Morris v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:46 pm
Socol v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:12 pm
The Sixth Circuit attempts to answer that question in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
This case is, Chicago Title Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:05 am
” Becker v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:57 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:00 pm
” NAACP v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 10:56 am
"The court first noted that in Kyllo v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:59 pm
Supreme Court decision in Florida v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 7:06 am
As the Colorado Supreme Court stated in Kane v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
Caplinger v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:48 am
BAKER v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 9:21 am
BAKER v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:58 am
In the recent case (Albert v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am
I'm pleased to say, though, that American law has turned sharply against attempts to punish speech that insults or even defames foreign political leaders; the old libel rules wouldn't survive New York Times Co. v. [read post]