Search for: "Cruz v. People"
Results 261 - 280
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2008, 5:45 pm
In Travis v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 14, 2008 Cruz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:59 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
Even the plaintiffs’ expert in Perry v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
De La Cruz, No. 06-1659, 07-2515 A conviction for drug-related offenses and denial of a motion for new trial are affirmed over meritless claims of error regarding: 1) a violation of defendant's speedy trial rights; 2) erroneous admission of evidence; 3) denial of the motion for new based on newly discovered evidence; 4) jury instruction; 5) ineffective assistance of counsel; and 6) whether the verdicts were against the weight of the evidence. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 5:24 am
Ted Cruz, and supported by a second lawyer, Gene C. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 12:24 pm
In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
Although less well-known than DACA, TPS currently protects more people. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
And, for that matter, if the Republicans controlled the Senate, and Ted Cruz were President pro tem, would not some people be skeptical about his presiding over Trump’s trial, given the very real possibility that he, like Democrats, could be a Trump rival for the White House in 2024 if Trump is not disqualified after an impeachment conviction? [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
The correct answer is “Supreme Court decision in Young v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:06 am
As early as 2016 he was touting extensive voter registration fraud potentially involving thousands of people in his home state of Indiana, although no evidence was found to back the claims. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 1:36 pm
Today, in Cruz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
That means it is unconstitutional, whether or not Roe v Wade is re-engineered or overruled.This revolting endangerment of young girls’ lives is particularly troubling when considering the irrational measures taken by Texas officials in dealing with COVID-19, which as of last month included Governor Abbott’s executive order banning the use of vaccine mandates in the public sector and Senator Ted Cruz’s proposed federal legislation banning mask mandates, vaccine… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:28 pm
On Tuesday, Bishop, 47, pleaded guilty to one count of capital murder involving two or more people and three counts of attempted murder. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
Yet these obvious comparisons didn’t even occur to the judges.In Tully v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 11:00 am
In 1981, in Haig v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm
It doesn’t have the right senior people working together as peers…. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Gibraltar The GBC had a report on the hearing in the hearing in the Gibraltar Court of Appeal in the case of Cruz v Financial Services Commission. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
