Search for: "Davis v. Key" Results 261 - 280 of 971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lawyers for Judiciary Committee Democrats described McGahn as both “critical” and the “most important fact witness” before the lawsuit was filed, noting he witnessed key obstruction episodes examined by special counsel Robert Mueller. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
Although those keys did not work at Wheeler’s home, the agents took the keys to an apartment complex where Wheeler had been seen once and tested the keys there on various doors until they found a lock that opened, and then performed a protective sweep of that apartment. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:32 pm by Giles Peaker
Fouladi v Darout Ltd & Ors (2018) EWHC 3501 (Ch) Although the judgment is dated December 2018, this has just appeared – a case on the perennially vexed topic of noise from a flat above. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
In this blog, I begin to summarise some of my key research findings as presented at the conference. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 2:48 pm by Giles Peaker
Blue Manchester Ltd v North West Ground Rents Ltd [2019] EWHC 142 (TCC) I’m not going to go into great detail on this case, despite its various enticing complications – an iconic new Manchester building (pictured above), Carillion (the contractor on construction) going into receivership, and the idiosyncratic view of the Manchester weather of HHJ Davies, sitting as a High Court judge: “It is also because its external elevations are fully glazed, the façades… [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by Sarah Grant
The primary precedent with which the court grappled is Rostker v. [read post]