Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 6,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2013, 5:39 am
State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:06 pm
CAAF has decided United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:39 am
In Lunbery v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
However, the appropriate question as set forth in the Report and Recommendation was “whether in late December 2017, EZL had been physically present in the United States for an amount of time sufficient for acclimatization and whether the United States had a degree of settled purpose from his perspective. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:29 pm
To some degree the court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 3:54 pm
United States, 536 U.S. 545 (2002), should be overruled.This case will be important to Kansas state-level practitioners because it will likely determine the constitutionality of the procedure Kansas uses to impose the Hard-50 life sentence. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 6:29 am
” Pesin v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:05 pm
The Vederi v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:32 am
In 2010, he received the Director's Award from United States Attorney General Eric Holder for superior performance for his work in the prosecution of United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:19 am
United States [scroll to pg. 112] (D UT, Dec. 5, 2006), a Utah federal district court dismissed on sovereign immunity grounds a suit brought against the United States and the state of Utah for damages. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:06 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:45 pm
This month in the Courts Howse v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
While Mason’s resentencing was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided Hurst v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:24 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 7:26 am
This week, in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully… [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:33 am
This was a fairly bold statement by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [read post]
