Search for: "Derring v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
In Mercredi v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 9:02 am
Genzyme v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
United States in the Trump v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
On the same day Warby j heard applications in Advertising Standards Authority v Mitchell and in Stunt v Associated Newspapers and the case of Morgan v Times Newspapers was mentioned before Soole J. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
"Wim van der Eijk observing howmuch the EPO empire has grownIPKat readers will note that Mr Justice Arnold has followed suit in his recent referrals, the Actavis v Sanofi judgment being one such instance. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:01 am
Today's the day the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-462/09 Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, Mijndert van der Lee and Hananja van der Lee, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (the Dutch Supreme Court). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:06 pm
In Luu v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 7:49 am
Moore v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
In Luka v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
” Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 3:49 am
At least the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) in Olympia-Rabatt stated that the relevant provisions of the German Olympia Protection Act 2004 must be interpreted restrictively. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
Bey v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 6:52 am
Firma Deco Line and Mietz v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Court of appeal of Brussels, 13 October 2022, Mylan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:17 am
State Police, 71 F.3d 480, 482 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Papachristou v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:10 pm
It's Case C-94/07, Raccanelli v Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften eV, a reference to the European Court of Justice from the Arbeitsgericht Bonn (Germany) for a preliminary ruling.Right: Max Planck -- the face that launched a thousand institutesThis reference related to Article 7 of Council Regulation 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community, which says:"1. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 am
See, e.g., Der v. [read post]
