Search for: "District of Columbia v. Armes" Results 261 - 280 of 1,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 11:03 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s method of analyzing Second Amendment issues – a three-part test that asks whether a regulation bans (1) weapons that were common at the time of ratification or (2) those that have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia and (3) whether law-abiding citizens retain adequate means of self-defense – is consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in District of Columbia… [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am by Charlotte Butash, Margaret Taylor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, in two cases concerning Congress’s Article III standing to sue over alleged executive branch illegality: Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:37 pm by David Kopel
A law that improperly prevents huge numbers of law-abiding persons from acquiring ammunition is straightforwardly unconstitutional under the methodology used by the Supreme Court in its leading Second Amendment cases, District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 7:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sunnyvale, 779 F.3d 991, 999 (9th Cir. 2015), intermediate scrutiny is warranted because the County and City Orders are "simply not as sweeping as the complete handgun ban at issue in [District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
These are precisely the types of laws that the Supreme Court overturned in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Grocery store: Sorry, the federal court doesn't have jurisdiction over any grocery employees outside the District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit v Ontario Nurses’ Association, the Ontario Labour Relations Board did not consider a nurse who had been involved in pandemic planning as exercising managerial functions under the Labour Relations Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 8:22 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the rule, prompting the plaintiffs to go to the Supreme Court, where they asked the justices to take up three questions. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am by Chris Castle
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah,… [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm by John Floyd
District Court for the District of Columbia in connection with Stone’s scheduled February 20, 2020 sentencing hearing before Judge Amy Berman-Jackson. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
.: The House Armed Services Committee's Future of Defense Task Force will hold a hearing on supercharging the innovation base. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am by Randy Beck, John Langford
To limit the burden on agency officials and prevent forum shopping, the statute might further provide that any qui tam action must be filed in federal district court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
And as Congress seeks to more aggressively assert its oversight authority, one of the constitutional authorities it could begin to pursue more commonly—without invoking the extreme option of sending the sergeant at arms to arrest executive branch officials—would be impeachment of the president or other executive branch officials for failure to comply with a subpoena, even outside the context of a preexisting impeachment. [read post]