Search for: "Doe Defendants I through X"
Results 261 - 280
of 983
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2020, 4:26 pm
This definition is adopted from paragraph (I) of the definition of “primary care practitioner” in section 1833(x)(2)(A)(i) of the SSA. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
I. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Furthermore, there is the matter of physicians reading the same X-ray in two, inconsistent ways. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The per curiam decision does not reveal whether the American Medical Association ethical and practice guidelines, discussed more fully below, were raised in support of the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
[i] In April, USDA announced an expansion of the meat packer price manipulation investigation it began last August. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
I mean it’s . . . very beneath him. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:00 am
") But of course looting does tend to lead to shooting (not invariably, but "when X starts, Y starts" is a figurative way of describing a tendency, not a logical certainty). [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am
App’x 914, 919 (11th Cir. 2014) (defendant “did not conceive or begin to i [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[17] The Reporter charitably noted that the problem could be in the infelicitous expression of some courts that short-circuit their analyses by saying “I see the problems, but they go to the weight of the evidence. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:09 pm
As a result your household does not qualify for band 1 priority or the associated priority star …” A couple of months later, the 5 years local connection criteria was met and a review of banding requested, with Mr F stating (though his volunteer helper), that he should be given band 3 through overcrowding. [read post]
15 May 2020, 5:57 am
In this case, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, Defendant (through its employee Rempel) told Plaintiff that it would send out an adjuster to inspect the damage (including the damage to the pie products) but then never did so. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:40 pm
We ran it through 100 car washes to prove it. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:42 am
Russia § 97, X v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Wilson, Defendant [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 11:39 am
If you came into my life telling people that I should not be on the bench for X reasons, it would disturb me greatly. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
App’x 354, 356 (9th Cir. 2019). [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Key Findings The Maryland General Assembly is on the verge of adopting a vaguely worded, legally dubious tax on digital advertising in the final days of this session—now paired with new tobacco taxes. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:23 am
Does that make sense? [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 1:45 pm
There are Doe defendants, and midway through the lawsuit, the plaintiff in that suit (like the plaintiff here) adds me -- Shaun Martin -- to the suit, claiming (as here) that I'm an "alter ego" or in some way responsible for the suit. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Brand X Internet Services. [read post]
