Search for: "Doe v. Andrews et al"
Results 261 - 280
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Hogan Lovells’ Simon Nesbitt et al. commented on March 26, 2014 in Lexology: While certain countries have terminated individual BITs, termination of all BITs would be unprecedented. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:30 am
Surveys reported the incidence of Salmonella in wheat flour ranged from 0.14% to 1.32% (Sperber et al., 2007), . . . [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
[et al.].Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010.International Criminal LawKZ6304.5.E94 C66 2010Fact-finding without facts : the uncertain evidentiary foundations of international criminal convictions / Nancy Amoury Combs.Combs, Nancy A., 1965-Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Les Québécoises et les Québécois forment une nation. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Just because a company uses an alternative method to go public does not mean that its investors are any less deserving of time-tested investor protections. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
It demonstrated that whether to classify digital assets as securities, commodities, or a separate asset class entirely does not matter to wire fraud charges.[19] In the eyes of law enforcement, NFTs are no exception to the general rule that “you can’t solicit funds for a business opportunity, abandon that business, and abscond with money investors provided you. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
”[12] So what does the evidence suggest? [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
A year-long subscription is $35.99.[9] How does AI create the avatars? [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda: THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020) July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Here, Muller et al. have created an excellent book with wide-reaching appeal whose focal point and strength are Bill Manbo's photographs. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 12:23 am
Popović et al., in which seven senior Bosnian Serb military and police officers face charges for crimes committed during July 1995 in Srebrenica and Žepa, will tomorrow begin a site visit of locations relevant to proceedings. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
A Lot of Reporters Must Be Calling Al Qaeda (May 15, 2006)101. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
But, why does he believe that this is an acceptable level of theft? [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
It defines Scope 3 emissions as “indirect upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions, other than scope 2 emissions, from sources that the reporting entity does not own or directly control and may include, but are not limited to, purchased goods and services, business travel, employee commutes, and processing and use of sold products. [read post]
