Search for: "Doe v. Group Long Term, et al" Results 261 - 280 of 506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am by Paul Smith
  But for Justice Scalia et al., this is not a problem. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
”[12]            So what does the evidence suggest? [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:15 am by Ben
Vita Tkach et al, in the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
“The FTC Act proscribes – and the First Amendment does not protect – deceptive and misleading advertisements. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
This augurs a long-term threat to the acceptance of IP as well, observes Neil.* Flood's patent threats action runs dryPatent actions are highly unusual territory where to see successful summary judgment applications, writes Katfriend Paul England while commenting the IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems & Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others [2015] EWHC 153 (IPEC). [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 7:37 pm by Bill Marler
 Such immunity does not last long, though. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lee et al., An Empirical and Consumer Psychology Analysis of Trademark Distinctiveness, 41 Ariz. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Selikoff’s substantial contributions to public health by publicizing the dangers of high exposure, long-term exposure to exposure do not privilege every position he took. [read post]