Search for: "Does 1-21" Results 261 - 280 of 17,461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2008, 12:04 am
Pitt has a weak offense, so this does not bide well for Panthers. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 2:14 pm by Frank Heft
§841(b)(1)(A)(ii)) and on the crack conviction it was 0 to 20 years (21 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
They are also eligible for work authorization, but deferred action is not a lawful status nor does it lead to a lawful permanent status. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The addition of the term “bent” to the wording of claims 1 and 9 does not add any new possibilities which were not immediately and unambiguously derivable from the disclosure of the prior art document. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by Eric Epstein
It is common at an arbitration hearing for each side to present diametrically different versions of the dispute. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:30 pm by FM Librarian
”, Washington Post, 20 March 2019 [text]Developing Collaboration at Regional and Country Level, Meeting of the Regional Information Management Working Group, Vienna, 21-22 Nov. 2018: Workshop Report [text]"The EU Claims the Migrant Crisis is Over in Europe—That Doesn’t Mean It’s Over," QZ, 18 March 2019 [text]"Here’s What the European Union Did to Stop Migrants from Coming," VICE News, 18 March 2019 [text]"Improving the Distribution of… [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:12 am by Steven Gursten
It does beg the question: does Governor Snyder hate motorcycle owners? [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:47 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Novelty (Article 100(a) and Article 54(1) EPC)Document (1) does not provide a direct and unambiguous disclosure of the feature of intramuscular injection and is thus not novelty-destroying for the subject-matter of claim 1.(...)5. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Kari D. Boyle
If empowering the client is a key element of a successful unbundling relationship, then what exactly does that mean? [read post]