Search for: "Does 1-32"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2007, 6:49 am
"The applicant conceded that claims 1 and 32 from U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:55 pm
But our construction of “support surface” does not give claim 1 the same scope as claim 6. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:30 pm
The application claimed that the mark was devoid of distinctive character [Art 7(1)(b)] and that the shape gives substantial value to the goods [Art 7(1)(e)(iii)].Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b)Only a mark which departs significantly from the norm or customs of the sector and thereby fulfils its essential function of indicating origin is not devoid of any distinctive character for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:01 am
The Rogers data does leave about 1% of its subscribers as repeat infringing after two notices (the number drops far below 1% after the third notice). [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:30 am
But Brewery does not make or sell sanitizing preparations. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 am
Section 32 did not apply because Mr. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 2:07 am
Article 37 (1) (a) . . . to the extent necessary to benefit from the exception. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 8:28 am
Researchers also attribute 32% of car accident fatalities to drunk drivers. 2) Doing something besides driving. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:49 am
Corporately owned nursing homes have 32% fewer nurses and 47% higher deficiencies that their non-profit counterparts. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
Does Your Home Health Agency Have These Documentation Problems? [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
(a)(1).) [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:41 am
But does their peeping rise to the level of being criminally or civilly liable? [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
Even if no sale or actual delivery of infringing goods actually occurred, the fact that the consumers were invited, by targeted advertising, to acquire ownership of the original or copy of the work in question, would suffice to trigger application of Article 4(1).What does this ruling mean? [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:07 pm
Id., col. 1, lines 32–34; see also id., col. 3,lines 21–25. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:27 pm
Does 1-32, 2011 WL 6182025, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 5:08 am
Third, the government should take the opportunity to revisit Section 32(1) to determine whether it should be expanded. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
N.J.S.A. 32:4-6; Pa. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:00 am
" Contents of vol. 32, spec. issue no. 1 (Dec. 2019) include:New Perspectives on the European Refugee Crisis. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 6:27 am
– does it even mention that hard drugs were essentially legalized in the state effective February 1, 2021. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 12:36 pm
§ 228.4(a)(1) does not create an exception to the 2008 Decision because the roads on which motor vehicles were prohibited ceased to be 'public roads,' as reasonably defined by the Forest Service. [read post]
