Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2020, 11:50 am
Unlike the Harris plan, Biden’s campaign does not include an income premium to pay for any version of a “Medicare for All” program. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:27 am
But does the answer matter at all in the UK? [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 6:54 pm
Warner’s Estate, 37 Vt. 356 (1864)). [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am
As a result, expanding survivor benefits does not provide an avenue for the federal government to revoke the State’s reverse offset status. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:17 pm
" Order ¶37. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:53 am
’Yesterday the Ninth Chamber of the CJEU ruled thus (with the main message in bold):Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 ... must be interpreted as meaning that a broadcasting organisation does not carry out an act of communication to the public, within the meaning of that provision, when it transmits its programme-carrying signals exclusively to signal distributors without those signals being accessible to the public during, and as a result of that transmission, those… [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:48 pm
§§ 314(a), 315(e)(1), and 37 C.F.R. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:35 pm
Reform 1, 11-29 (2003). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 10:08 am
FYNumber of Pre-Appeal Brief Conference RequestsPercent of AppealsProceed to BoardReopen Prosecution Withdraw Rejections Defective Request20066,52524%55%37%5%3%20077,24025%56%38%4%2%20088,25527%59%37%2%2%20099,96730%56%39%3%2%201012,01934%56%38%5%1%Prior to the pre-appeal brief conference program, a majority of appeals cases never reached the Board because the rejections were withdrawn after the applicant filed its formal brief. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 7:32 am
For example:The provisions of 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1) in effect on November 1, 2007 are hereby waived to the extent that a continuing application that satisfies the conditions set forth in 37 CFR 1.78(d)(1)(ii), (d)(1)(iii), or (d)(1)(vi) will not be taken into account for purposes of determining whether there is an "other application filed on or after August 21, 2007 that also claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, or 365(c) of… [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Moses on the defendant does not contain the wording required in Rule 37B(1)(c)(iii)… [7] In Lau v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 2:31 am
On 18 February 2014, British Sky Broadcasting Group filed a notice of opposition on the basis, inter alia, of its EU word mark SKY registered on 22 May 214 in classes 9 and 37 and its UK word mark SKY registered on 7 September 2012 in classes 9 and 37. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:56 pm
Income in excess of $12,500 will be subject to the 37% income tax bracket. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm
As Tim Cleary [the Hearing Officer in that opposition] said: "Notwithstanding the fact that the Opponent did not formally abandon the other grounds of opposition, namely those under Sections 6(1), 8(1)(b), 8(3)(b), 8(4)(a), 10(1), 10(3), 10(4)(b), 37(2) and 42(2) of the Act, I am satisfied that there is no need for me to give them any serious consideration [that's NINE grounds of opposition, raised for no good reason]. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
In decision T 254/93 it was decided that the mere explanation of an effect obtained when using a compound in a known composition, even if the effect was not known to be due to this compound in the known composition, cannot confer novelty to a known process if the skilled person was already aware of the occurrence of the desired effect (see headnote 2 and point [4.8] of the reasons).[36] Thus the subject-matter of claim 1 does not comply with the requirements of A 54; the main… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
It is submitted that it probably does not, but that the excessively vague drafting of Šilih does not allow for certainty on this point. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 2:02 am
While the USPTO rarely requires originals of executed documents, it does require certified copies of foreign priority applications. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:15 am
Orphan medicinal products are excluded from the right to the six-month SPC extension offered in Article 36(1) of the Paediatric Regulation. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 11:39 am
The structure of debates staged in accordance with this section and 11 CFR 114.4(f) is left to the discretion of the staging organizations(s), provided that:(1) Such debates include at least two candidates; and(2) The staging organization(s) does not structure the debates to promote or advance one candidate over another. [read post]
