Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 261 - 280
of 4,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
For this last week: Doe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 1:09 pm
Oct. 14, 2016) (J.A. 1–25), finding that, interalia, Elbit failed to demonstrate by a preponderance of theevidence that claims 3–5, 13, 24–28, 31, and 34 (“theAsserted Claims”) of the ’159 patent would have beenobvious over U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 11:44 am
ALS is a fatal neurodegenerative condition with an overall annual incidence of 1 to 2 per 100,000 people in the general population. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:27 pm
However, SOCAN will have to deal with the majority ruling in the ESA decision that:[41] In our view, the Court in Bishop merely used this quote to emphasize that the rights enumerated in s. 3(1) are distinct. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 8:37 am
Who has that right and what does it entail? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:11 pm
’487 patent col. 2 ll. 33–41. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 2:40 am
This is essentially because the intervention needed to fall within the scope of Article 3(1) does not require to be strictly indispensable: mere facilitation seems enough. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44 36 32 50… [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 12:42 am
The chances are especially high if the user seeks to apply for a trade mark application for related goods and services, or in Gigi Dior’s situation, services that Dior does not want to be associated with. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:26 pm
Seemingly seeking to align its decision with the one in Case C-105/17 Kamenova, where this factors had been considered, the Court qualifies it by holding that the claimant consumer does not lose this quality as long as they do not offer their services as a poker player for remuneration or formally register them. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:21 pm
Utah May 1, 2009): [T]he Tenth Circuit would prefer courts "'not use the term 'standing' as shorthand for a defendant's capacity to challenge a search,'" the court does so here for clarity. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:29 am
A weak mind does not accumulate force enough to hurt itself; stupidity often saves a man from going mad. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:38 am
It is true that while Article 1 of Schedule 1 refers to 'cross-objection', Article 3 of that Schedule does not refer to cross-objection as such but that in our opinion make no difference. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:18 pm
In our view, that by itself does not throw any light on the scope of section 41 of the Act. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:13 am
This refusal was confirmed by the BoA in case R0153/2021-1. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:23 am
To ensure that your feedback may be considered, please submit it no later than December 1, 2013. 1. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
But, credit where credit is due, it does tend to make things stand out. [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
Doe did not appeal the Decryption Order. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
DAPA does not involve country-specific relief. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:49 pm
Terr. 1820) — possibly the very first reported case from the Arkansas Territory — says the following: The old notion that if the woman conceived, it could not be a rape, because she must in such cases have consented, is quite exploded. 1 Hale, 631; 1 Hawkins, ch. 41, sec. 8; 1 East, P.C. ch. 10, sec. 7, p. 445; 1 Russ. on Crimes, 677. [read post]
