Search for: "Does 1-57" Results 261 - 280 of 3,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 FactsIn June 2011, Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited (the applicant) initiated revocation proceedings against Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Merial Limited (the respondents) for the annulment and repeal of the Patent 1998/10975 (the patent) in terms of section 61(1) of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the Act) because the invention was not patentable under section 25 of the Act as the invention was not new and it lacked an inventive step. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 5:21 am by Rose Hughes
The High Court decision in Illumina v MGI ([2021] EWHC 57 (Pat) hit the IP headlines for its application of the Supreme Court decision in Regeneron v Kymab ([2020] UKSC 27) (see IPKat: Illumina v MGI Part 1: Mr Justice Birss on sufficiency, DNA sequencing and chocolate teapots). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:00 am by Unknown
  APC is waived if author does not have access to publishing grant; if author does have access, the APC is US$2000. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:09 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Specifically, ALJ Rogers determined that the accused Nintendo products do not infringe (1) claims 16, 27-32, 44, 57, 68, and 84 of the ‘151 patent, and (2) claims 2, 4, 11, and 14 of the ‘268 patent. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:52 am
  The judge said Larson, 57, and Pfaff, 58, were "centrally involved" in the brazen tax shelter scheme "that didn't pass the smell test from Day 1. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:09 pm by Unknown
The Guidelines provide a nonexhaustive list of principles to use when analyzing ai-assisted inventorship: 1. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 12:04 pm by Patrick McDonnell
The recent executive order does not reference this title. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:24 am
 Does this seemingly-counterintuitive loss indeed, well, err? [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:59 am by war
(Rares J’s emphasis) and 57 The Minister then explained in the Senate, repeating the words of the Further Supplementary Explanatory Memorandum, why cl 111(1) had been reworded saying (ibid): “This relates to time shifting. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 7:45 am by Anna Maria Stein
The GC replied that “The disclosure of an earlier design within the meaning of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 does not, as such, constitute a fact within the meaning of Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002, but the ‘result of a factual assessment’, EUIPO being required to examine all evidence submitted in order to establish whether it actually proves disclosure of the earlier design” (para 87) and that “the disclosure of an earlier… [read post]
A striking 57 percent of respondents signaled low confidence in the President to handle Iran, whereas only 28 percent signaled high confidence. [read post]