Search for: "Does 1-75" Results 261 - 280 of 4,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Employee sued the school district, contending that, among other things, his termination was unlawful and that he was entitled, pursuant to the provisions of Civil Service Law §63(1), to return to his previous position of "custodial worker. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A public authority [Employer] filed disciplinary charges against an officer of the Employer [Plaintiff] pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 alleging that Plaintiff had made a number of unauthorized purchases using "agency-issued" credit cards. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A public authority [Employer] filed disciplinary charges against an officer of the Employer [Plaintiff] pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 alleging that Plaintiff had made a number of unauthorized purchases using "agency-issued" credit cards. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:47 pm by Dennis Crouch
A public meeting will be held on July 20, 2010, 1:30 pm at the USPTO. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 7:06 am by Adam Sandler
While the Act does not state that no more than 40% of total amount of loan forgiveness may be attributed to non-payroll costs like the old 75/25 rule, can we safely assume that will be the case? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
A Women's Legal Defense Fund representative commented, "A woman who does less than everything for her child is seen as a terrible mother; a man who does more than nothing is praised as a wonderful father. [read post]
§1673 - 75% of earned but unpaid wages or 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage; the greater of these two. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Although Hopton contended that she was appealing the disciplinary determination, the Appellate Division said that such an appeal “does not preclude the application of collateral estoppel. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 12:45 pm by FM Librarian
," The Guardian, 14 Aug. 2018 [text]How to Claim Asylum in the UK (Free Movement Blog, Sept. 2018) [text]The Kafkaesque “Diciotti” Case in Italy: Does Keeping 177 People on a Boat Amount to an Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty? [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:10 pm
  Two, at least some consumers consider their $30-75 monthly Internet access payments ample compensation for the retail ISP to deliver traffic without whining. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:30 pm by kris
The team cannot exceed 75 spots. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:33 am
At $5,000 a month benefit, there's a total of $60,000 of potential claims, but that premium (which does include some helpful riders) tops $250 a month. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:19 pm
Studies indicate that the incidence of wrong way drivers increases at night between 1-3 a.m. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The arbitrator directed the District to [1] reinstate the employee to his former position; [2] credit him with the seniority to which he would have been entitled had his employment not been wrongly terminated; and [3] pay him "back pay for the salary and other benefits [he] lost as a result of [his] improper termination," retroactive to 30 days before he filed his grievance.CSEA initiated a CPLR Article 75 proceeding to confirm an arbitration award in its favor while the… [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   In its Opinion, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ruled that, based upon the plain language of §1738(c) an increase to the limits of UIM coverage for multiple vehicles that are insured under an existing policy does constitute a “purchase” for purposes of §1738(c). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:37 pm by David Jensen
Unfortunately, the application and review system for this RFA does not accommodate iterative refinement and resubmission, a key feature of CIRM 2.0. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:06 am
"And in John Doe, Esq., in today's DJ, Justice Gilbert shares some musing and anecdotes about anonymity. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:45 am by Eva Rosenberg
”   Dear RJ, If you have a three-year contract, the IRS does not consider it temporary. [read post]