Search for: "EASTERN EXPRESS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 261 - 280
of 636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Five years ago, in Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 5:00 am
” EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom agreed, stating that the EU-U.S. trade negotiation should not be hindered by “artificial deadlines. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
On March 6, 2018, a district court judge in the eastern district of New York found that the CFTC has standing in a case related to virtual currency fraud. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Trump likewise is no fan of such constraints or institutions, expressing (at various times and to various degrees) criticism of NATO and the United Nations. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
This decision serves to ensure a growing split in the circuits that may well see a test before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:03 am
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has publicly expressed doubt the U.S. can do anything to contain or mitigate the Russian threat. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:11 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
The letter states: As Attorney General of the United States, I have a duty to defend the Constitution and to faithfully execute the laws passed by Congress. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am
In one of the lawsuits, CREW v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
United States or permitted by the court’s decision in Munaf v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
In contrast to the Tree Top Court’s unwillingness to infer an implied demand, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, in Scottsdale Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
Ct. 2175, 2188 (2014).Although we read even express preemption provisions narrowly, a state cannot avoid compliance with a federal regime “merely by relying upon a connection to an area of traditional state regulation. [read post]
