Search for: "Employers' Liability Cases"
Results 261 - 280
of 18,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
The court used this case as an opportunity to clarify a decades-long question about the applicability of both theories to a situation in which an employer admits that an employee’s actions were within the scope of employment. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:05 am
The problem is that employment discrimination suits tend to be attorney-fee driven, with the result that lawyers will file and aggressively pursue marginal liability cases with the hope of striking it big with an attorney fee award. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:55 am
Notably, this case highlights best practices for employers: to take employee wishes and concerns with respect to their own pronouns, identities, and gender expressions seriously. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
In his recent February 19, 2016 decision in the case of Doe v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 3:39 pm
The IRS is like a hibernating bear in these payroll tax cases. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:30 pm
The IRS is like a hibernating bear in these payroll tax cases. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 6:29 am
Twp. of Livingston: Subordinate’s Indirect Influence Can Leave Employers Open to Liability Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 6:29 am
Twp. of Livingston: Subordinate’s Indirect Influence Can Leave Employers Open to Liability Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 6:29 am
Twp. of Livingston: Subordinate’s Indirect Influence Can Leave Employers Open to Liability Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 5:35 am
Judge Brandon Gibson wrote a dissent in this case, asserting that Tennessee should adopt the preemption rule. [read post]
29 May 2017, 12:46 pm
However, the tests employed to determine liability in the case of secondary asbestos exposure are not set in stone and differ from state court to state court. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:51 am
The Facts of the Case On a cold January morning, the plaintiff was running an errand for her employer which required her to pick up an order at the defendant’s shop. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:45 am
Appeals, Case No. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:41 am
“An FCC ban on arbitration of privacy claims would be the anti-consumer-protection approach” [Geoffrey Manne & Kristian Stout, Truth on the Market] Montana case could bypass Daimler limits on state-court jurisdiction in cases under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, Washington Legal Foundation urges certiorari [BNSF v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
Under Title VII, an employer's liability for such harassment may depend on the status of the harasser. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:18 am
See LinkedIn Lessons for Employers: Part 1 (Integrated-Enterprise Status) LinkedIn Lessons for Employers: Part 2 (Successor Liability) LinkedIn Lessons for Employers: Part 3 (Agency Liability) [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Vicarious Liability For Employee Actions In many cases, when an employee is involved in a car accident while performing work-related duties, the employer can be held vicariously liable for their actions. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:13 pm
” The order was issued in the consolidated cases of Myers v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:41 am
Each employment case has two parts. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:56 pm
With the number of positive cases recently on the rise, employers are growing more concerned about exposure to COVID-19-related liability. [read post]
