Search for: "Ex Parte Yielding"
Results 261 - 280
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 10:36 am
One wonders about First Amendment-procedural issues that may be lurking at the fringe—e.g., whether the hearing was ex parte and whether the scope of the injunction should have been narrower. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:38 am
One can’t compare the control group against a self-selected sample of the treatment group, nor can one compare self-selected parts of the treatment group (high Bible study participants) against other self-selected parts (low Bible study participants). [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 2:51 pm
Copyright must yield to the need for a complete evidentiary record; © can’t be used to undermine truth-seeking function. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
from Ex parte Frisa The Examiner has presented a sound rationale as to why a person of ordinary skill in the art would have modified the 3D ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus of Hashimoto with the teachings of Cortinovis to arrive at the claimed method (see, e.g., Ans. 5-6 and 26-35), and thus has provided sufficient evidence to support a prima facie case of obviousness. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:32 am
The criminal trial could have produced jail time and fines for the ex-officers, but the civil trial can only yield monetary payment and/or “equitable relief,” meaning that the court would order the defendants to do or not do something – no jail time. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
That's not the troubling part. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:55 am
from Ex parte HASHIMOTOThe Examiner finds that the combination of Kanefuji and Kroyerdiscloses many of the elements of claim 1, but does not disclose securing acore to an upper mold. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 3:00 am
From Ex parte FRAZERAs to obviousness:Obviousness requires more than a mere showing that the prior art includes separate references covering each separate limitation in a claim under examination. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:11 am
That is where you have a stepbrother or a stepfather, at some point they are afraid to tell their mother or close relatives, ex cetera [sic]. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 3:32 am
Mahler: What results did the experiments yield, and did they support your thesis? [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 10:18 am
PTAB cites to KSR and Keller in Ex parte Gontkosky:Appellants’ arguments are not persuasive. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
Details: Ex parte Foster (PTAB 2010) illustrates a typical "Graham factors" argument against obviousness. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
KSR is cited in Ex parte Ban“The combination of familiar elements according to known methodsis likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:55 am
Appellants lose on obviousness in Ex parte MARSHALL MEDOFF .Attorney argument failsAppellants argue that it is not predictable that lignocellulosic materialwill behave the same way as cellulosic material described in the IAEAreference. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:37 pm
Today's Ex Parte Ochs decision is a perfect example of this. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm
She writes, “where one individual does not have a Fourth Amendment interest, grouping together a large number of similarly-situated individuals cannot result in a Fourth Amendment interest springing into existence ex nihilo. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:29 pm
Other family members have played a crucial part in her illicit career. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
They show a low rate of the sort of errors any complex system of technical collection will inevitably yield. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
Both KSR and Adams are cited in Ex parte Talanis :The Federal Circuit has stated that “rejections on obviousness grounds cannot be sustained by mere conclusory statements; instead, there must be some articulated reasoning with some rational underpinning to support the legal conclusion of obviousness. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
A post at Biomass Mag on the latest Gevo/Butamax court decision includes the text:According the SEC filing, the court ruling is not material to the business of Gevo and is not material to any of the company’s other pending litigation cases with Butamax.A press release issued by Butamax notes that the court granted its summary judgment motion for invalidity of the [Gevo] ‘375 patent,Hmmm, a ruling that claims of a U.S. patent to Gevo are invalid is "not material to the business of Gevo"? … [read post]
