Search for: "Exact Property "
Results 261 - 280
of 4,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 2:40 pm
" Forgetting of course that law students in the 1960s did the exact same thing. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:26 am
However, Rock Star called its strip club The Pig Pen and did not feature an exact version of The Play Pen’s logo. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 11:45 am
Whether the nexus and proportionality tests set out in Nollan and Dolan apply to a land-use exaction that takes the form of a government demand that a permit applicant dedicate money, services, labor, or any other type of personal property to a public use. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:19 pm
The complaint accuses Foxx of negligently maintaining the sidewalk, though exact details on the condition of the sidewalk have not been released. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 5:31 pm
Instead, the affordable housing program is designed to combat a state-wide concern that has little to do with the specific development the owner planned for its property. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:06 pm
Many of those others seem to make an excuse for promising one thing and claiming to be on the consumers’ side, while later doing the exact opposite. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
State of Hawaii Land Use Comm'n, No 11-1-1145-06 (KKS), filed last week, in which the plaintiff asserts that the Land Use Commission changed the land use boundaries from "urban use to agricultural use while affordable housing was being constructed on the property. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 6:35 pm
This is not a formal determination of the exact locations of wetland on the property. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
In some suits for enforcement (most commonly in suits to enforce child support), one means of relief sought is jail time–confinement of up to 60 days in county jail to be exact. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 1:21 am
Maui's affordable housing exaction working...or not? [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:35 am
The agreement also outlines the exact real estate or personal properties that are being conveyed in the transaction. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 12:26 pm
For property owners, it serves as a reminder that if you believe a permit condition requiring a dedication or exaction is improper, you must timely challenge that condition — you cannot accept the benefits of a permit, such as approval of a subdivision map, and preserve the right to challenge the dedication down the road. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 11:09 am
Be that as it may, both takings and illegal exactions generally require compensation for the losses suffered by the property owner. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
(First published in the California Real Property Journal, a quarterly publication of the Real Property Law Section of the State Bar of California) By Dave Lanferman The quest to increase the supply of affordable housing has been an important public policy goal in California for decades.[1] That goal, however, has proven to be elusive. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:33 pm
To be clear, the Georgia law does not say that a property owner has to expect the exact crime that occurred. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:20 pm
For instance, if you take a lunch break on-location, in an area set up by your employer for this exact purpose, and get injured there, it’s possible to be eligible for workers comp, as you are still on your employer’s property. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm
After the appellate court affirmed, the Florida Supreme Court reversed, holding that, as a matter of Federal takings law, a landowner can never state a claim for a taking where: (1) permit approval is withheld based on a landowner's objection to an excessive exaction, and (2) the exaction demands dedication of personal property to the public. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In other words, under Nollan and Dolan, a government can require an exaction of property as part of its approval of a land-use permit. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In other words, under Nollan and Dolan, a government can require an exaction of property as part of its approval of a land-use permit. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:53 am
The Court also dismissed the concern that taxation and other exactions would face constitutional takings challenges by noting that courts have managed to distinguish them in the past – although it did not articulate a clear rule that would facilitate such distinctions going forward. [read post]
