Search for: "First v. Armes (1983)" Results 261 - 280 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in more en banc news, the Sixth Circuit will reconsider its decision granting habeas relief to an Ohio man who has thrice been sentenced to death for a 1983 murder. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 12:03 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  Some of Congress’s very first authorizations of force, in the quasi-war with France in the 1790s, authorized the President to use only limited military means (U.S. armed vessels) against limited targets (certain French armed vessels). [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Pa. 2021). 11 See Dirks, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). 12 See, e.g. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:07 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
[v] “According to a 2007 interview Klein gave on Colombian TV, his infant firm made $2 million from that deal alone. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
As such, it would fall under a separate set of provisions and related expedited procedures under the War Powers Resolution—provisions widely believed to be unconstitutional following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Gans, The American Law of Torts at § 3.12 & note 88 (1983 & Supp. 1984) (collecting cases on joint flooding and polluting). [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144 (involving a First Amendment challenge to license plate restrictions), and Bullard v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am by Phil Dixon
The plaintiff abandoned his First Amendment claim on appeal, given Egbert v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 11:25 am
Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 954 (1983). [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Mokwa, No. 07-3110 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit brought by twenty-five protesters against St. [read post]