Search for: "Fisher v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,015
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that he was arrested, incarcerated, and criminally prosecuted for engaging in constitutionally protected free speech and was detained and arrested without probable cause in violation of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
” Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
The answers to the certified questions issued by the majority opinion are as follows: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
The majority answered the certified questions as follows: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003); and now Fisher v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
Wade, are in far less peril than more recent decisions, such as the affirmative action case of Fisher v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
United States, a bank-fraud case, rejecting Lawrence Shaw’s argument that he could not be found liable under the federal bank-fraud statute if he only intended to defraud a third party, not the bank itself, and remanding for consideration of questions about the jury instructions. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 12:47 pm
Fisher, who also arguedCrawford v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
Fisher. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
"Bongiovanni stated he spoke with Nella on several occasions after her husband died and suggested to her that she execute a new will. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 5:19 am
When President Obama nominated then-Second Circuit judge, Sonia Sotomayor, to the Supreme Court of the United States, some of us were more than a little dubious about the selection. [read post]
