Search for: "Food Fair Stores v. Food Fair"
Results 261 - 280
of 411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2014, 8:07 am
Supreme Court’s decision Rutherford Food Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:58 am
Seventy years later, Jersey Lynne Farms is a major, full line food distributor selling to supermarkets, institutions, convenience and bagel stores, delicatessens, diners and restaurants throughout the metropolitan New York area. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Bottled water is considered a food, and we have a nice little preemption case in The Chicago Faucet Shoppe, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:23 am
First, the court noted that the statute virtually forced courts to “select among trifles” and rejected the view, akin to its decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
While Davidon Homes v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
In Haag v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 731 F.3d 1106 (10th Cir. 2013). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Conversely, the IPO’s argument that Tesco should not have the monopoly of the term simply because it was the largest user seems fair. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 2:35 pm
In Irizarry v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:40 pm
In the salient ruling Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc v US Dep’t of Labor, the Eleventh Circuit rejected a private settlement of back wage claims between an employer and its employees. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
The employees contend that the Seventh Circuit’s decision conflicted with the First Circuit’s holding in Tum v Barber Foods, Inc and, more importantly, with the High Court’s decision in IBP, Inc v Alvarez. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
” None of them, by the way, state explicitly that foods [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
FX goes after retailer for trademark over iconic X-ringhttp://t.co/nTRFcStpU0 -> Aereo fighting to avoid injunction – it's only a matter of time http://t.co/cbS8l8TEP0 -> Osler law firm develops fair dealing guidelines for AUCC http://t.co/NL0zxa54Oa -> Fox v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
FX goes after retailer for trademark over iconic X-ringhttp://t.co/nTRFcStpU0 -> Aereo fighting to avoid injunction – it's only a matter of time http://t.co/cbS8l8TEP0 -> Osler law firm develops fair dealing guidelines for AUCC http://t.co/NL0zxa54Oa -> Fox v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 12:54 pm
I understand the Supreme Court’s and the Eleventh Circuit’s view in not allowing employees to waive claims under the FLSA (though I do think it means unnecessary and typically protracted litigation for all involved), but that is because the FLSA has Section 216(c), which provides (and as the Eleventh Circuit explained in Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm
While we’re on the subject of alcohol and rational deliberation (presuming at least a process of ‘democratic deliberation within’ before casting one’s vote), Elster also notes that in Tanner v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 6:26 am
The Court of Appeals affirms, and the plaintiffs win.The case is Irizarry v. [read post]
