Search for: "G. S. VERSUS T. S."
Results 261 - 280
of 528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm
Plantronics’ election of species ofFigures 1A and 1B did not amount to such a surrender ofclaim scope.The PTO’s restriction requirement did not suggestthat the different inventions it found were based ondifferences in structure (i.e., “elongated” versus an“arch”). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:28 pm
Paying for experimental medical treatments which insurance won’t cover. f. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
Continuing from Simon’s interesting post on The GOP’s Response to VAT. . . . [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:18 am
To understand the CSX versus Robert Peirce case, you need to know little about the mass torts world. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:45 pm
(El tÃÂtulo forma parte de los tÃÂtulos de juego de palabras tongue in cheek, injustificables, que han ido derramándose poco a poco desde las páginas de P12 y Olé hasta sitiales insospechados, con el objeto de demostrar que el autor es muy perspicaz; de más está decir que repudiamos esta… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:41 pm
" Nothing about §2409a(g)'s text or context gives reason to depart from this beaten path. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
This outbreak has 15 cases versus more than 4,000 in the German outbreak. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
James G. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
It wasn’t just a monetary investment that the patents spurred; Myriad’s commitment goes much deeper than money. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:13 pm
G. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 12:31 pm
Custom Hardware Eng’g & Consulting, Inc., 421 F.3d 1 [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The first, the Sixth Circuit’s “authority or duty” test, required plaintiffs to prove “state action” by establishing that either (1) the “text of state law requires an officeholder to maintain a social-media account,” (2) the defendant official “use[s] … state resources” or “government staff” to run the account, or (3) the “accoun[t] belong[s] to an office, rather than an individual… [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:01 am
To respond to this, W-L acquired Orrick’s word processing operations in Wheeling, WV g. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
The result is a near-complete division in the case law: when a political or religious plaintiff sues a political or religious defendant for trademark infringement, it can often win, whereas a commercial actor that sues a political actor will often lose on the ground that the Lanham Act simply doesn’t apply to the political actor’s speech. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(EPLAW) Cheapflights: OHIM excludes likelihood of confusion between conflicting signs, due to very low degree of distinctive character of earlier marks: T-460/09; T-461/09 (Class 46) General Court upholds opposition brought by PEPE JEANS against PEPEQUILLO CTM application: T-580/08 (Class 46) Royal treatment rejected in Luxembourg: T-397/09 (Class 46) ‘G’: Emram v OHIM: Guilty against Gucci (Class 46) General Court: summer time I… [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:06 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
Even though there are quite specific rules defining what is and isn't kosher, the OU's kosher certification is defined simply as indicating “that the production of said goods and that the rendering of said services has been supervised by the rabbinical supervisors of the applicant, under the direction of . . . [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 7:28 am
Who is the reasonable person and why hasn't she been attending class? [read post]
