Search for: "Grant v. Parker" Results 261 - 280 of 731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Texas Supreme Court, for example, has a pending case, Parker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am by Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker
Steiker is the Judge Robert M Parker Endowed Chair in Law and Director of the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
Parker    Eastern District of Kentucky at LondonCOOK, Circuit Judge. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 8:39 am by Clayton Perkins
Parker, of Joseph, Hollander & Craft LLC, of Topeka, won in State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Benefiting from an intervening Supreme Court ruling decided in 2015, Young v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:11 am
Parker Jr., appellant NEW YORK COUNTYReal PropertySeller Restrained From Disposing of Condo During Pendency of Buyers' Action for Specific Performance Robison v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am by Conor McEvily
  Monday’s cert. grant in Clapper v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:56 am
See Huddart Parker Ltd v The Ship "Mill Hill" (1950) 81 CLR 502 at 508 - 509; Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Co Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197; FAI General Insurance v Ocean Marine Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association; Akai Pty Ltd v People's Insurance Co; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corporation and Anor; Owners of cargo on vessel Eleftheria v Owners of Ship Eleftheria [1969] 2 All ER 641 at 645. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm by Jani
The machine-to-transformation is not, according to the US Supreme Court, the only definitive test, but more of "...a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under §101".Gavin always thought in the abstractThe majority's decision hinged heavily on its previous decisions of Gottschalk v Benson, Parker v Flook and Diamond v Diehr. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2002); see also Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. [read post]