Search for: "HAIR v. STATE" Results 261 - 280 of 1,758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2020, 6:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals rules that the search that produced narcotics was illegal.The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
[¶] No actual corporate benefit has been stated and there is no evidence that proper judgment was exercised either. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by Derek T. Muller
I think it would require this “state-specific v. general competence” question to be addressed. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
District court: Dismissed. Eighth Circuit: Dismissal may have been correct under our old precedent, but the Supreme Court's recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Hair loss is a side effect of Taxotere, but in the MDL, plaintiffs claim that they have experienced permanent hair loss, which was not adequately warned about in their view. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:18 pm by Laura Macfarlane
In the 2013 decision in Department of Correctional Services v POPCRU, the Supreme Court of Appeal considered whether the dismissal of five employees, for violating departmental dress code prohibiting male correctional officers from wearing their hair in dreadlocks, was discriminatory and automatically unfair on grounds of religion, culture and gender. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:38 am by John Hochfelder
The trial judge reduced the damages to $6,000,000 for pain and suffering and $600,000 for loss of consortium, In Nemeth v. [read post]