Search for: "Hand v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 261 - 280
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2010, 3:04 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:21 pm
Childs et al. v Commissioner of Internal Revenue 103 T.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:19 am
The Internal Revenue Service and the Tax Court have repeatedly concluded that section 7805(e) of the Internal Revenue Code creates an exception from the Administrative Procedure Act’s requirements for temporary regulations, even though the APA’s legislative entrenchment rule seemingly prohibits this interpretation. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:20 pm
Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code excludes from gross income amounts received from personal injury awards. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
The institutions, laws, and regulations of the United States convey control and formulation of trade policy into private hands. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
The institutions, laws, and regulations of the United States convey control and formulation of trade policy into private hands. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
Commissioner, US Tax Court, charitable deductions Similar Posts: Taxes, Donations and Lending a Hand Give a Little Bit. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:05 am
Unfortunately, there is no per se rule on UBIT for an MSO in either the Internal Revenue Code or Treasury Regulations. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:28 pm
For example, in Dana v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:08 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 134 T.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:01 am
"Allowable deduction" generally refers to a deduction which qualifies under a specific Code provision whereas "allowed deduction," on the other hand, refers to a deduction granted by the Internal Revenue Service which is actually taken on areturn and will result in a reduction of the taxpayer's income tax. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 22 B.T.A. 1407, 1931 WL 473 (U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:56 am
Since CAIP v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 8:52 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 132 T.C. 15 (2009), the taxpayer was receiving distributions from her IRA which satisfied the substantially equal payment exception to the 10% penalty. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
FTC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Ranch royalty rate survey (IP finance) FreePatentsOnline: a remarkable symmetry - 'Flash of Genius' sponsorship of Patent Plaque Program (IP finance) Managing external patent specialists (Innovationpartners) The first step to generating revenue from 'patent monetisation' is understanding what the term means (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Think business cannot predict the future? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Dec. 1, 2003) No. 13391-01. [read post]
