Search for: "High v State"
Results 261 - 280
of 35,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or… [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:08 am
Diaz v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:11 am
” O’Brien v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am
From Pryor v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:36 am
In the case Diamond v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 7:58 pm
In Butler v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:57 pm
Next, in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Egilman of course was the editor in chief, with an editorial board made up of many well-known, high-volume testifiers for the lawsuit industry: Adriane Fugh-Berman, Barry Castleman, Michael R. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:18 am
See Banaian v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
I've benefited from much thoughtful commentary about last week's arguments in Trump v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See King v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm
Palkon et. al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:20 pm
³ See, D’Amore v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Key US Supreme Court decisions, such as Jones v. [read post]
