Search for: "Holder v. Smith" Results 261 - 280 of 573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 2:10 am by Randall Reese
 The companies, which are 85% owned by affiliates of Wind Point Partners, reported in court filings that they've reached an agreement with holders of a majority of both their first lien and second lien debt to reduce their current $252 million in debt by approximately $140 million. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This decision is a significant follow-on to the Delaware District Court’s recent opinion in Temple Inland, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This post is from the Reed Smith (and now we should add Cozen) side of the blog only, as Dechert is involved in the litigation to be discussed.You’ll have to forgive us – we’re weird that way – but we found the opinion in Carter v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Timmerman-Cooper    Southern District of Ohio at ColumbusJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:59 am
For information regarding subscribing to Gallerywatch services contact [www.gallerywatch.com] Â Subscription needed for online access: Â 11/10/2009 Draft Legislative Text of the Restoring American Financial Stability Act, S.G.W. 130 (PDF 1.7 MB) Draft of the Bill as Expected to be Unveiled by Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Chairman Chris Dodd on Nov. 10, 2009 11/10/2009 Summary: Restoring American Financial Stability Act, S.G.W. 130 (PDF 276 KB) Summary of the Bill as Unveiled… [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:47 am by Ben
And in Access Copyright v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
  This concerns the principle of exhaustion as interpreted and applied by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-128/11 UsedSoft v Oracle (see Katposts here and 1709 Blog posts here). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Norwegian goes on to cite the decision in Armor Screen Corp. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In doing so, the Board appears to be attempting to expand the waiver policy of Hyatt v. [read post]