Search for: "IN RE: RULES FOR DISTRICT COURTS OF OKLAHOMA" Results 261 - 280 of 388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 3:10 pm by Ken
And see, you’re — you — you’re the kind of guy, you don’t want to get into this to settle this, mano y mano. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
s was not particularly favorable to challenges to the validity of opinions about causation, but even as Rule 702 evolved in federal court, both plaintiffs’ and defense counsel were unable to antagonize Dr. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:18 am by CJLF Staff
Court Rules Herzog Placement Valid: Jordan Guinn of The Stockton Record reports California's 3rd Appellate District Court ruled Loren Herzog was rightfully paroled to the state-issued trailer in a fenced-in compound outside High Desert Prison, where he committed suicide earlier this year. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Montana maintains that the state supreme court’s ruling does not conflict with Citizens United. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm by David Mowry
If you’re so inclined, it could be one of yours as well. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:03 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Supreme Court recently ruled that conditions violated the Constitution’s 8th Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
The Oklahoma constitutional amendment would never take force, having been struck down by a federal district court, a determination upheld by the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in January 2012. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by John Elwood
—or perhaps the memos are still flying trying to resolve how they’re going to dispose of the case. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm by Robert Milligan
 At least one Georgia court has interpreted the new Act as providing courts discretion to re-write restrictive covenants to make them enforceable, rather than merely providing the authority to remove overbroad covenants. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm
Additionally, in light of the multiple regional analysis required to determine market power and impact, maintaining a class action would not be manageable, the court noted.The decision is In Re: Cox Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
Russo, which was related to the 8th District’s decision two weeks ago in In re Carothers. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:02 am
’” For better or worse, we’re stuck with the rules of the game we created. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:05 pm by Stacy
In In re Transdata, Inc., Smart Meters Patent Litigation, seven actions pending in five districts were transferred to the Western District of Oklahoma. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Bexis
 As a federal district court charged with applying Texas law under the Erie doctrine, the Southern District of Texas was bound to follow:  (1) decisions of the Texas Supreme Court, and (2) predictions of Texas law made by the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:57 pm by Lara
 Jaso timely appealed and the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed the district court’s ruling in numerous aspects, but reversed and remanded as to the ability of Jaso to amend his complaint on his copyright infringement, contributory infringement, Lanham Act and declaratory judgment claims. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
  (IP Osgoode) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Second District Court declares Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute unconstitutional: Rogers v. [read post]