Search for: "Illinois v. Michigan" Results 261 - 280 of 952
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2019, 3:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
A Michigan appellate court correctly enforces a Muslim couple's "mahr" agreement, entered at the time of the couple's marriage and calling for the husband to pay certain funds to the wife -- it's a valid contract, enforceable under secular law, regardless of its religious motivation.From Ali v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, and North Dakota determined that GILTI could be fully offset by the dividends received deduction. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
TrueNorth originated in eastern Iowa and now has offices in Tennessee, Texas, Illinois, Michigan and Colorado. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 12:21 am by Paul Caron
Targeted Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs In Developing Countries Sunday: Michigan Hosts 13th Annual Empirical Legal Studies Conference University of Illinois Law School... [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 10:37 am by JAntonelli
Strike 3 Holdings LLC filed in 12 states in September, including New Jersey, Connecticut, Michigan, Florida, Virginia, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New York, California, Texas, Washington, DC and Colorado. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 10:18 am by JAntonelli
Malibu Media LLC filed in 10 states in September, including Virginia, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Michigan, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Texas and Nevada. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am by Joyce Kung
Accordingly, the WOTUS Rule is now the controlling law in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia and Washington. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 153950 (SD IL, Sept.10, 2018), an Illinois federal district court rejected a magistrate's recommendation (2018 U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 2:10 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 150721 (ED MI, Sept. 5, 2018), a Michigan federal district court denied summary judgment for the Michigan Department of Corrections in a suit by Jewish inmates who claim that the kosher meals being provided are not adequately protected against cross-contamination that would make them non-kosher.In Gill v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]