Search for: "In Re: Mathes v." Results 261 - 280 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2007, 3:30 am
  Exhibit A in that regard is Riches v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:54 pm by Jamie Markham
For those of you who—unlike my high school math teachers—don’t need me to show my work, I’ll cut to the chase. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
It looks like they’ve all “done the math” and figured out that it’s worth the hassle of taking on the administrative burden. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
It looks like they’ve all “done the math” and figured out that it’s worth the hassle of taking on the administrative burden. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court was appropriately dismissive of this argument: they’re allowed to use math to show that it would be impossible to brew that many cups at that recommended strength with that measurement method. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In re C2R Global Manufacturing, Inc., No. 18-30182-beh, 2021 WL 1347193 (E.D. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am by Jason Rantanen
  The math suggests not, at least at these high rates of guarantee. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
See for example this report on the collaborative drafting of a book on “Homotopy type theory” (which is some kind of bleeding edge math theory, if you’re curious). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Whereas Techdirt people might get more of a kick from doing well at a math problem in and of itself. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
  "[V]ery bad…for the law firms that pay them, for the associates who receive them, for the clients who foot the bill for them, and for the society we serve. . . the higher salaries are wasted dollars. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:12 pm by Jerome H. Juday
Something that has been stuck in my craw for awhile now has been the Alaska Supreme Court’s decision in Roeland v. [read post]