Search for: "In Re Adoption of Steven S." Results 261 - 280 of 762
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2017, 8:32 am by Doug Cornelius
(Why hold a Rose Garden conference to say you’re not changing?) [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
KKR Financial Holdings LLC  (here) and the Delaware Chancery Court’s January 2016 court decision in the In re Trulia Shareholder litigation (here). [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
  When you’re in Jones land and when you’re in Fitzgerald land turns out not be clear. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by J. Dana Stuster
Haass reserves particular concern for the development of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine, calling it a “major turn” in the way states relate to one another, though he notes that it has not been adopted as an international norm in practice. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
” Among other changes, the bill would require agencies to analyze the costs and benefits of new regulations, adopt the most cost-effective means to achieve their goals, and review their most significant rules at least once every ten years. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
In other words, the law established that by virtue of a Soviet’s faith—Judaism or Evangelical Christianity—courts should presume the alien’s claim of persecution. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:23 am by Randy Barnett
It does that by promising that historical materials pertaining to the Constitution’s adoption contain definitive answers to contemporary constitutional questions. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
(Justice John Paul Stevens was the only member of the court who did not participate in the cert pool at that time. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Ninth Circuit has also adopted Justice White’s approach in upholding a California law prohibiting mental health practitioners from providing sexual orientation change efforts therapy to children under the age of 18. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
  Andrew suggested in particular that “re-writing amendments” should be proposed before trial (or in certain circumstances at the commencement of trial). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]