Search for: "In Re B"
Results 261 - 280
of 26,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2023, 6:28 am
Limiting the re-registration period to 60 days for these particular beneficiaries might place a burden on applicants who cannot timely file, but who otherwise would be eligible to re-register for TPS. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
The post Arkansas Issued Bulletin 13-2024 RE: Use of AIS in Insurance appeared first on Insurance & Reinsurance. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:26 am
See In Re 4-2(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, 2011 Ark. 141. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 11:15 am
She was banned from re-entering the US for five years under INA 212(a)(9)(A). [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:14 am
Section 522(b)(3)(B) provides for the exemption of property held as a tenant by the entireties. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:11 pm
August 13, 2013) Among other points, the text observesIn re: Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 216 F.R.D. at 172 (corporation is obligated to produce one or more Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses who are thoroughly educated about the noticed deposition topics and facts known to the corporation or its counsel).As to the matter of facts, can the Court order that a party depose a fact witness INSTEAD OF a 30(b)(6) witness? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 1:41 pm
The Consumer Product Safety Commission has amended the CPSIA by exempting electronic products from the lead limitation provided by Section 101(b)(2) provided the component part is not accessible "if it is not physically exposed by reason of a sealed covering or casing and does not become physically exposed through reasonably foreseeable use and abuse of the product including swallowing, mouthing, breaking, or other children’s activities, and the aging of the product, as… [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 8:26 am
For example, the Lindt-case does not mention specifically whether re-filings and re-applications qualify for determining bad faith.The Board’s attention thus focused on the General Court’s decision in Pelikan (T-136-11). [read post]
9 Jan 2006, 8:21 am
In re Toro-Arcila, 334 B.R. 224 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:11 am
Plaintiffs first contended that they had a protectible property interest in the re-zoning of their property based on the preliminary B-PUD application that was submitted to the Butler County officials. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
Remoteness Re-Invented? [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:35 am
” In re Atl.Marine Constr. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:53 am
Unlike 401(k) plans, administrators of 403(b) plans are not considered fiduciaries - and, therefore, have no legal or ethical obligation to monitor plans to ensure they're in the best interest of the participants. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 1:54 pm
Juvenile law — Illegal sentence — Restitution We are concerned in this case with the propriety of an award for restitution entered against B.W., a juvenile, by the Circuit Court for Worcester County, sitting as a juvenile court. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:19 am
Administrative law — Mootness — Collateral consequences After an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) ordered the involuntary admission of A.B. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:06 am
Juvenile law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Attempted theft On May 9, 2018, S.B. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
Juvenile law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Malicious burning and destruction of property After a hearing on the merits, the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, acting as a juvenile court, found appellant J.B. involved in second degree malicious burning of property, burning a trash receptacle, and malicious destruction of property under $1,000. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 2:24 pm
Juvenile law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Robbery, assault, theft and conspiracy The Circuit Court for Charles County, sitting as the juvenile court, found “B.C. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:22 pm
The judicial authorities cannot be involved in re-writing history (see Wegrzynowski, [65]). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
(b) does any act of extraction and/or re-utilisation by that party occur (i) in A only (ii) in B only; or (iii) in both A and B? [read post]
