Search for: "In Re EG"
Results 261 - 280
of 821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
So, if we take the UK, the category of works of artistic craftmanship needs to be seriously re-considered. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:18 am
For example, if a family with kids and a CSR-eligible income is shopping for coverage, they’re not going to see CSR plans in the browsing tool nor will they see CSR plans in any quotes. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 8:30 am
Last point, and interestingly, while Brazilian firms might be sensitive to issues of sustainability (pp. 90, 94), a reference to sustainability in Central American coffee production (pp. 162) is noted, human capital (and resources) is mentioned several paces (eg pp. 18, 28, 49, 93, 116, 169, 196, 229, 252, 254, 271, 278); property rights are noted at pp. 111-112); the human rights landscape in investment did not play a prominent role in the analysis. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:25 am
This is an interesting decision, not only in terms of the uncommon amount of the awarded damages for the infringement of this “sui generis” right, but in understanding how evidence (regarding the infringement, and not the other requirements, eg effort, investment…etc…) should be gathered and produced in similar cases. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:27 pm
Is the question whether you should own (and be able to transfer) or not your digital downloads really less important than the question whether you should be able to watch BBC iPlayer while outside the UK, eg on holiday in Greece [but then another question would be why on earth one could possibly want to do that instead of sunbathing on a beach in Santorini]? [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:32 pm
This becomes an interesting avenue to transmogrify "purchased opinions" into something which can be treated as facts.A separate consequence will be re-evaluation of a party stipulating to infringement to seek review at the CAFC (eg, Gevo v Butamax). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
, AGCOM president Mr Marcello Cardani proudly declared that “The European Commission, with which a constructive work has been done during the drafting phase of the Regulation, congratulated with AGCOM for the fair balance of interests that the Regulation has achieved (see Commission’s letter re draft regulation on 3 December 2013). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
Mezei then takes us through the various re-trials and his analysis of the decisions, highlighting the limitations of their strategy as “tremendous negative externalities of the content industry’s file-sharing litigation, eg, irrecoverable damages, bad public relations and growing disobedience of copyright norms. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:21 pm
The relationship between this new Law and the Special 301 Report can be seen in the cables leaked by WikiLeaks, eg here and here.After this, even though new levels of protection were in place, the most relevant point, the provision of links to P2P networks, still was not treated as a criminal offence under Spanish law, as we can see in the famous cases of Sharemula(2008) and Pablo Soto(2014). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:42 am
However, at the moment re-opening the InfoSoc Directive does not seem to feature high in the agenda of the Commission (although it is unclear how text and data mining for commercial and non-commercial purposes alike would be achieved).Is it smart? [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 7:30 am
In addition, the USPTO, if it has the authority, would be wise to announce that they're waiving the fee normally charged for non-electronic filing of new applications-the failure to file electronically is almost certainly not the fault of the applicants. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 11:22 am
(BBC)But the past is merely prologue to a re-imagined present. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:33 pm
We’re on a journey. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:47 pm
If there is justification for them to be enacted or enforced by formal decision-taking bodies (eg. through laws or treaties) then there should be a clear pathway for that to happen. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 8:55 am
(eg.) [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:03 pm
If you have had to get another contractor to re-do the work then I think you are entitled to seek compensation from the agents of the extra costs you have incurred. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:36 am
Because of the comments received, the FASB decided in September 2008 to "re-deliberate" the issues raised by the proposal. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:02 pm
All dates of products marked “DE EV 203 EG” have been recalled. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 11:09 am
"Obviously, some of these would be excluded from insurance coverage here (eg IVF and certain weight-loss procedures). [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:15 pm
They’re probably unique in the world on this one. [read post]
