Search for: "In Re Frye"
Results 261 - 280
of 280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:54 am
They're also bad for your bones. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
We are reposting this edition of “Petitions to watch,” which features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ January 7 conference. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Merrell challenged Swan’s unpublished, non-peer-reviewed re-analyses as not “generally accepted” under the Frye test. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
One of the ways we feed this blog is doing what comes naturally to us lawyers - reading recent cases - and hoping that something inspires us. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
., 661 N.E.2d 352, 354 (Ill. 1996); Frye v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
., In re Welding Fume Prods. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
The recent opinion piece by Kevin Elliott and David Resnik exemplifies a rhetorical strategy that idealizes and elevates a burden of proof in science, and then declares it is different from legal and regulatory burdens of proof. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:55 am
As most might know (perhaps from a previous post), the Food Safety and Inspection Service’s (FSIS) stated mission renders it “responsible for ensuring that the nation's commercial supply of meat, poultry, and egg products is safe, wholesome, and correctly labeled and packaged. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:35 pm
Salmonella is a leading cause of foodborne illness worldwide, with an estimated 1.4 million cases each year in the United States alone (1). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:39 pm
With several recent recalls of Salmonella-tainted beef in 2009 and recent reports of Salmonella-tainted chicken, getting a better understanding of Salmonella - especially Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella - is a good way to start off the New Year. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
’ Now They’re Better at It Than the GOP. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
.: American Association of Retired Persons Abandon: To knowingly give up without intent to return or re-claim. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Frye (Univ. of Kentucky College of Law) William T. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In re TC Heartland, LLC, No. 2016-105, at 10 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Frye (Winston Salem, NC)Capitol v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
Richard M. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. [read post]
