Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
For example, family court judges may receive mandatory training in which they’re warned about the unfavorable publicity that could result if they deny requests for civil protective orders. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
Circuit released its redacted opinion In re Grand Jury Subpoena, the mysterious case with apparent links to the Mueller investigation concerning an unnamed corporation (“the Corporation”) owned by an unnamed foreign country. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
And yes, this indeed reflects “extensive quality controls” as far as the feds are concerned. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:54 am
” The opinion we’re concerned with is In re Schivo, 2011 WL 4899940 (U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am
Lemley: We are almost entirely in agreement with the PTO, except that they are more concerned with ensuring that the the examination is administrable. [read post]
Illinois Court Sets Elements for Retaliatory Discharge Under False Claims Act in Partnership Dispute
9 Sep 2016, 9:25 am
Further, Associated insisted it was Donald’s violation of his confidentiality agreement, not his inquiry about fraud, that precipitated the motion to terminate. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:54 am
" See id., at 31-32 (citing In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal. 4th 298, 320 (2009)). [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:51 pm
But the compelled decryption of lawfully-seized devices does not present identical concerns. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:44 am
This was the proper inquiry under 40 C.F.R. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 10:39 am
In re Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
If there’s any doubt, the judge will have to decide“. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 9:11 am
Cox to Bazelon Re GJ (PDF) Cox to Bazelon Re GJ (Text) [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:48 am
What if you’re black? [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:24 am
The result is that the dictum by Mrs Justice Proudman in Meltwater, ie that “the test of quality has been re-stated but … not significantly altered by Infopaq” (para 81), possibly (and regrettably) still remains the most explicit stance in this respect. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:57 am
” The Report followed an extended inquiry into UK agencies’ surveillance practices prompted by the Edward Snowden revelations; while it concludes that the agencies have generally acted within the prescribed legal limits, it also calls for a total overhaul of the UK legislation governing electronic surveillance, which it finds to be fragmented, overly complex ,and confusing. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Judge Pohl had two concerns about reconsidering his decision denying an inquiry into the joint defense agreement. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:26 am
” He threatened to conduct hearings concerning misconduct by the prosecutors (shades of the conduct that led to the issuance of the writ of mandamus in In re United States, supra). [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
Judge Michael T. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:14 am
A federal judge, responding to the fears of people who will not be detained, has now facially invalidated a law codifying a long chain of judicial and executive lawmaking concerning detention authority more broadly. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 6:29 pm
"Personally, yes, I am concerned," U.S. [read post]
