Search for: "In Re U.S. Grand Jury Subpoena"
Results 261 - 280
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The most notable is In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 438 F.3d 1141 (D.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
In In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 265 F.Supp.2d 321, the Southern District of New York held that “that (1) confidential communications (2) between lawyers and public relations consultants (3) hired by the lawyers to assist them in dealing with the media in cases such as this (4) that are made for the purpose of giving or receiving advice (5) directed at handling the client's legal problems are protected by the attorney-client privilege. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), to the Scooter Libby/Judith Miller case, are quite hostile to the idea of a privilege in the face of a grand jury subpoena, and as I noted in my response to Chris Bray’s thoughtful post, the policy of the common law is hostile to such a privilege: For more than three centuries it has now been recognized as a fundamental maxim that the public (in the words sanctioned by Lord Hardwicke) has a right to every man’s evidence. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
Treble damages shall be available in cases of willful or wanton disregard by the party obtaining the subpoena. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
The Third Circuit reaffirmed the jurisdictional requirements for appealing an order to produce allegedly privileged documents in In Re: Grand Jury, ABC Corp.; John Doe 1; John Doe 2, No. 12-1697 (3d Cir. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:00 am
He was a grand jury witness who was told he was not a target. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:34 am
’” In re Grand Jury Subpoena No. 11116275, 2012 WL 691599 (U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED MARCH 25, 2011 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:47 pm
In In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563 (1st Cir. 2001), the intervenors claimed that they themselves had an attorney-client privilege to assert. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Case no. 11-12268 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:27 pm
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 2012 U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
[FN3] The government issued a grand jury subpoena to John Doe to come and open the encrypted files. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) The important decision is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am
The requested records date to January 2007, and those subpoenaed have been instructed to bring them to a federal grand jury convening Feb. 29 in Reno. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:15 pm
Id. at 1414, citing In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527 (2d Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F3d 910 (8th Cir. 1997); In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, (D.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:58 pm
Back to the grand jury courtroom. [read post]
