Search for: "In Re v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 17,069
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Were Trump re-elected, and contrary to Professor Lederman's hopes and aspirations, the question of whether the President is an "Officer of the United States" will not be "re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Auld Company v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
So every time a relative sues to try to get damages for the death of a relative in the United States, those are all statutory. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 2:25 am
As Elena Kagan famously put it years ago: "We're all textualists now. [read post]
The Recalibration of Colonel Brock: D.C. Circuit Ruling for J6 Rioter Could Impact Hundreds of Cases
3 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Rudnick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
General Assembly recognised Russian responsibility and encouraged the creation of an international compensation mechanism as well as a register of damage (A/RES/ES-11/5). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Alessandro Maurini, The Missed Revolution at the Origins of the United States (2022). 6. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974; Administrative Procedure Act) United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
In that same footnote, Justice Stevens also quoted United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Bush) by saying Congress had to re-enact a formula determining which states had to pre-clear election law changes. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
RE 38,551 and U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm
In November, the justices heard United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:54 pm
Regarding data breaches, Transunion LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
